German Acts   TM-Conqueror   Contact   Imprint   Links
Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law)
german-domains-domainlaw-udrp-adr-licence-antitrust-advertising-law-ec-ecj-food-trademark-search patent application representation epo european patent office represent lawyer attorney 


 

 

 

 

 

 

  Overview   Practice   IP Law   Computer Law   Media Law   Advertising Law   Trademark Applications   Sample Texts   Attorneys Fees   Court Rulings

 

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe patent law trademark law utility model law design law domain law plant law know how law copyright law

european attorney german ip law germany intellectual property law lawyer germany law firm germany ip law it law food law european law

ip-attorney-germany intellectual property attorney in germany and eupore ec lawyer law office ip law ip firm ip prosecution ip litigation media law antitrust law advertising law competition law unfair competition lawyer attorney ec competition law

patent-trademark-attorney-at-law patent law trade mark law design law lawyer agent european attorney domain name law udrp copyright law adr it law german commercial law company law pharma law adminishment law

 

 

 

>Start >Overview >Court Rulings >Computer Law >BGH-Paperboy
>Start

The judgement of the German Supreme Court of 17th July 2003 – Docket No.: I ZR 259/00 – “Paperboy” (on admissibility of deep linking)

In its ruling of 17th July 2003, the German Supreme Court held that web pages containing publicly accessible news articles may be linked directly (so-called "deep linking" or "web-clipping") while bypassing the entry pages of content providers. The plaintiff, a media group that publishes several newspapers and magazines sued the search engine provider "www.paperboy.de" for forbearance. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s use of deep links violated the plaintiff's copyright and database rights, as well as the Unfair Competition Act. According to the plaintiff, the defendant's search engine violated the Unfair Competition Act because it enabled internet users to bypass the plaintiff’s home page, and thus bypass the  advertisements placed on the home page. The court held that the plaintiff’s copyright and database rights were not violated since the plaintiff and owner of the copyright had consented to such use by putting the articles online and thus making them publicly accessible. Every internet user enjoys access to the work simply by finding out the URL. The court held that the use of hyperlinks eliminates the need to enter the URL manually, thus making access to the internet more convenient.

Furthermore, the court held that the defendant had not violated the Unfair Competition Act since he did not take any steps attempting at concealing the plaintiff’s identity as the source of the articles. Although the plaintiff could incur damages due to fewer hits on advertisement banners on his website, he cannot demand such detours. The functionality of search engines is one of the limitations of the internet which has to be accepted, the court held.

 

german-trademark-trade-mark-law-patents-utility-models-competition-solicitor-law-firm trade name law trade mark lawyer trademark prosecution trademark ltitgation deutsch english-lawyer-attorney-iplaw-ip-lawyer-it-law-itlawyer international law wipo domain law domain name law international registration ir mark ec mark community trademark english

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print | trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save | law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyer back | european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-law enquiry


© 1998-2012 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak· Georgstr. 48 · 30159 Hannover · Germany
Fon: +49.511.357356.0 · Fax: +49.511.357356.29 · mailto:horak@iprecht.de